Literature Review: Financial Hardship and Academic Performance among College Students

Comprehensive review of research linking financial hardship (financial strain, food/housing insecurity, employment) to college students' academic outcomes (GPA, retention, graduation). Summarizes theories, empirical findings, measurement approaches, methodological issues, gaps, and practical implications — useful for researchers, instructors, and administrators.

Review of Related Literature: Financial Hardship and Academic Performance among College Students

This review summarizes the conceptual frameworks, major empirical findings, measurement approaches, methodological issues, research gaps, and practical implications from the literature examining how financial hardship affects college students' academic performance.

1. Definitions and scope

  • Financial hardship / financial strain: subjective experience of insufficient financial resources to meet needs (paying tuition, living costs, basic needs) and objective indicators such as low household income, eligibility for Pell grants, or lack of savings.
  • Basic needs insecurity: food insecurity and housing insecurity among students, increasingly studied as concrete forms of financial hardship.
  • Academic performance: commonly operationalized as GPA, course completion, credits earned, retention/withdrawal, time-to-degree, and graduation.

2. Theoretical frameworks used

  • Stress process / transactional stress model: financial strain acts as a chronic stressor that depletes cognitive and emotional resources, reducing study capacity and performance.
  • Conservation of resources theory: loss or threat of resources (money, housing, food) triggers coping efforts (working more hours) that reduce resources for academic tasks.
  • Maslow / basic needs perspective: unmet physiological and safety needs (food, housing) undermine higher-order functioning such as learning and concentration.
  • Human capital and opportunity cost models: time spent earning income (employment) reduces available study time; financial investments and aid influence persistence decisions.

3. Key empirical findings (themes)

  • Association with lower academic outcomes: Numerous studies report that students experiencing financial strain or basic needs insecurity have lower GPAs, earn fewer credits, and are more likely to stop out or drop out. Effect sizes vary by sample and measurement but are commonly small-to-moderate after adjusting for background characteristics.
  • Food and housing insecurity matter: Research on student food insecurity (e.g., national surveys and campus-level studies) links it to worse grades, higher psychological distress, and lower persistence.
  • Working while enrolled: Moderate employment can be neutral or beneficial for some students, but long work hours (commonly cited >15–20 hours/week) are frequently associated with reduced academic performance, especially when work is financially necessary rather than for experience.
  • Mediating role of mental health and sleep: Financial hardship is strongly associated with stress, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and sleep problems, which mediate the effect on academic outcomes.
  • Protective effects of financial aid and supports: Adequate grants, emergency aid, campus food pantries, and counseling services attenuate negative effects and support retention.
  • Heterogeneity by institution and student group: Associations are stronger among community college students, first-generation students, low-income students, and those with caregiving responsibilities.

4. Measurement approaches

  • Financial hardship measures: objective indicators (family income, Pell eligibility, employment hours) and subjective measures/scales of financial strain.
  • Basic needs measures: standardized food insecurity modules (e.g., USDA short form) and housing insecurity questions; some campus surveys adapt these tools.
  • Academic outcomes: institutional records for GPA, credits, retention; self-reported GPA used when records unavailable.
  • Mediators/covariates: mental health (CES-D, PHQ-9), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), sleep quality, hours worked, social support, and demographics.

5. Common study designs and analytic methods

  • Cross-sectional surveys are most frequent; longitudinal cohort studies exist but are less common.
  • Analytic strategies: multivariable regression, mediation analysis (to test mental health or sleep pathways), propensity score adjustments, fixed-effects models for some longitudinal data, and survival/retention analyses.
  • Limitations often noted: self-report bias, reverse causality (poor academic performance may increase financial strain), residual confounding, and nonrepresentative samples (single-campus convenience samples).

6. Representative findings and reports

Large-scale institutional and national reports (for example, reports from The Hope Center for College, Community, and Justice) document high and persistent rates of food and housing insecurity among college students and a reproducible link to academic outcomes. Peer-reviewed studies across community and four-year colleges consistently find negative associations between basic needs insecurity and GPA/retention, with mediation by mental health and time constraints.

7. Gaps and methodological needs

  • More longitudinal and quasi-experimental studies to strengthen causal inference (e.g., using administrative aid changes, emergency grant rollouts, or policy variation).
  • Cross-national research and studies in low- and middle-income countries are limited.
  • Intersectional analyses exploring race/ethnicity, gender, caregiving status, and immigration status are needed.
  • Better measurement harmonization across studies (consistent food insecurity modules, standardized financial strain scales) would improve comparability.
  • Intervention studies: randomized or rigorous evaluations of emergency aid, housing supports, and integrated student services are relatively rare.

8. Practical and policy implications

  • Campuses can reduce academic harms through emergency financial aid, targeted grants, expanded meal supports, affordable housing initiatives, and integrated mental health services.
  • Financial counseling and flexible course scheduling (night/weekend options; asynchronous content) help working students balance responsibilities.
  • Data systems linking basic needs screening with academic records allow early identification and timely intervention.

9. Recommendations for researchers

  • Use mixed methods: combine administrative data (GPA, credits) with validated survey measures for financial hardship and mental health.
  • Design longitudinal studies or exploit natural experiments (policy changes, aid programs) to improve causal claims.
  • Report effect sizes, adjust for confounders (parental income, prior academic performance), and test mediation/moderation explicitly.
  • Consider equity-focused designs and include diverse institution types (community colleges, HBCUs, minority-serving institutions).

10. Search strategy and recommended sources

Suggested databases: PsycINFO, ERIC, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations, and Google Scholar. Grey literature: The Hope Center for College, Community, and Justice; American Council on Education reports; government education agencies.

Example search string (adapt by database):

'("financial hardship" OR "financial strain" OR "financial stress" OR "financial aid" OR "economic insecurity") AND ("college students" OR "undergraduate" OR "postsecondary") AND (GPA OR "academic performance" OR retention OR graduation OR dropout OR "course completion")'

11. Starter list of influential works and sources to consult

Note: verify full citation details in your chosen citation manager. Representative sources include institutional reports from The Hope Center for College, Community, and Justice (often titled 'Real College' reports), Sara Goldrick-Rab's work on college affordability and student basic needs, and peer-reviewed studies on student food insecurity and academic outcomes (authors such as Maroto, Bruening, Richardson, Eisenberg, and others). Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses on student mental health and on food insecurity provide useful syntheses.

12. Short summary

The literature indicates a consistent relationship between financial hardship (including food and housing insecurity) and poorer academic outcomes among college students. Mechanisms include increased employment hours, stress and mental health problems, and unmet basic needs that reduce cognitive and time resources for studying. Evidence supports targeted financial supports and integrated services, but more causal and longitudinal research is needed, as well as rigorous evaluations of interventions.

If you want next steps

  • I can produce a formatted literature matrix (author, year, sample, measures, main findings, limitations) for 10–15 key studies you specify or I can select.
  • I can draft a methods section and proposed measures for a study on this topic (sample size, instruments, analytic plan).
  • I can run suggested database search strings and provide detailed citations (if you want a bibliography in APA).

Which of these would you like next?

References and reports to consult: The Hope Center '#RealCollege' reports; Sara Goldrick-Rab, Paying the Price and related research; recent peer-reviewed studies and reviews on student food insecurity, financial stress, and academic outcomes (searchable in the databases listed above).

Ask a followup question