PDF

Opening (in an Ally McBeal cadence — light, quick, a little theatrical)

Okay — imagine you're reading an old, twisty sentence and it sounds like someone thinking out loud while walking in courtroom heels. You listen, you copy, you try. Then — aha — you start to use the shape of that sentence to make your own. That’s what we’ll do: first copy, then pattern‑copy, then make it yours. Friendly, legal, and a little dramatic. Scene: a 13‑year‑old writer learning how sentences can dress up ideas.

1. What is "Imitating Sentence Patterns"?

It’s a focused practice: you look at a model sentence, notice the kinds, number, and order of clauses and phrases it uses, and then write your own sentence that follows that same pattern. You are not copying words — you’re copying structure. This helps you build a toolbox of sentence shapes so your writing sounds varied and clear.

2. Short translation of Augustine (City of God, Book XIX, section 1) — modern English paraphrase

Model A (early exemplar paraphrase): "Because I must next dispute about the two cities — the earthly and the heavenly — I seem to need first to set out how much of this work can be completed, the arguments of men who have tried to make for themselves a blessedness in the unhappiness of this life, so that from their vain things our hope differs from what God has given us; and the very thing itself is that true blessedness which will be given, not only by divine authority, but also when reason is applied, as we can rightly apply it because of unbelievers."

Model B (later copyist’s pointing/parsing paraphrase): "Since I will argue about both cities, earthly and heavenly, I must first explain the limits by which the work may be finished; the arguments of mortals, by which they labored to make themselves blessed in this life’s misery — so that, from their empty possessions, our hope differs from what God has given — and that very thing is real blessedness, which will be granted, not only by divine authority but also, when reason is applied, becomes clear because of unbelievers."

3. How to analyze the model (step by step)

  1. Mark clause types: Which are adverbial clauses (because, since, when)? Which are relative clauses? Which are noun clauses acting as objects?
  2. Count phrases and clauses in order: e.g., opening adverb clause, main clause, a parenthetic phrase, a series of noun/relative clauses.
  3. Note punctuation that shows how the writer wanted the reader to breathe or to join ideas (commas, colons, pauses). In medieval manuscripts, punctuation was added where a reader might get confused — do the same in your draft to guide readers.

4. Guided imitation (exact patterning, then freer version)

We’ll take Model B’s pattern: Adverbial clause → main statement (with a need/exigency) → list/clarifying phrase → comparative clause → restatement with contrasting authority/reason.

Student imitation — close pattern (example):

"Since I must decide between two teams, the friendly and the fierce, I will first explain how much of this season we can complete; the strategies of players, who have tried to claim glory amid a long losing streak — so that, from their small victories our expectations differ from what the coach has planned — and the real success is the team spirit, which will grow, not only by official rules but also, when common sense is used, becomes clear to new players."

Student imitation — freer, voice added (example):

"Because the festival holds both the simple and the spectacular, I need to begin by saying which parts we can actually finish; the plans of families, who have hoped for perfect weather in a season of clouds — so that, from their bright hopes our plans differ from the city’s schedule — and the true joy is how people gather, not only by invited guests but also, when kindness shows up, becomes obvious to everyone."

5. Exercises (step‑by‑step practice)

  1. Copy Model B by hand once. Do not change words — just copy. (Focus: rhythm and punctuation.)
  2. Label the clauses and phrases in the model. (e.g., adverb clause, main clause, parenthetical list, comparative clause, concluding noun phrase.)
  3. Write one sentence that duplicates the same order and kinds of clauses but uses your own topic (school, sport, pets, a party).
  4. Rewrite that sentence two ways: make one simpler, and one more complex (add a participial phrase or a noun clause series).
  5. Read your sentences out loud. Mark where you would breathe or pause. Add or remove punctuation to help meaning.

6. Quick checklist for success

  • Did you keep the same kinds and order of clauses? (Yes/No)
  • Does the sentence still make sense and sound natural? (Yes/No)
  • Does punctuation guide the reader through complex parts? (Yes/No)

7. Exemplary outcome — student sample and teacher note

Student name: Jamie (age 13)

Sample sentence (Jamie):

"Because I must choose between two science projects, the practical and the imaginative, I will first explain which parts can be finished on time; the experiments of students, who tried to prove a simple idea in a short week — so that, from their small results our expectations differ from the scientist’s plan — and the real accomplishment is learning, which will come, not only from correct data but also, when curiosity is encouraged, becomes clear in every report."

Teacher comment: Jamie followed the model’s pattern (adverbial opener, main clause, clarifying parenthetic clause, comparative clause, concluding restatement). Punctuation helps the reader. The sentence shows variety in structure without sounding forced.

8. Homeschool report — Presented as a legal brief (exemplary outcome)

Caption: In the matter of Jamie’s Mastery of Sentence Patterns — Lesson: "Imitating Sentence Patterns" (Augustine model, English paraphrase)

Issue: Whether Jamie demonstrates understanding and controlled use of varied sentence structures and punctuation to guide meaning.

Facts: Jamie completed copying of Model B; labeled clause types; wrote three original sentences following the model’s clause order; revised punctuation after aloud reading; produced one polished sentence shown above.

Holding: Jamie has met the stated learning objectives and demonstrates competence beyond simple copying: performs structural analysis and creates original sentence patterns.

Reasoning: Jamie consistently maintained the model’s clause types and order, used punctuation to clarify complex segments (mirroring medieval manuscript practice), and produced natural prose (voice preserved). Evidence: labeled analysis sheet, three drafts, final polished sentence.

Disposition/Order: Lesson objective: Achieved. Recommendation: Continue with series practice (three more patterns) and short paragraph work to build coherence across sentences.

9. ACARA v9 alignment — How this lesson meets or exceeds Year 8, 9, and 10 outcomes

Note: Below are plain‑language descriptions of typical ACARA Year 8–10 writing/language standards. This lesson is mapped against those skills.

Year 8 — Relevant outcomes and how the lesson meets them

  • Outcome focus: Understanding sentence structure; using a range of sentence types to clarify meaning; using punctuation to guide readers.
  • How this lesson meets the outcome: Students identify clause types, reproduce clause order, and practise punctuation to make meaning clear. The guided imitation and aloud reading directly develop those skills.
  • Meets or exceeds? Meets and can exceed: A typical Year 8 student who completes the exercises and produces a controlled imitation (like Jamie’s) meets the Year 8 standard. Exceeding occurs if the student consistently varies syntax across paragraphs and self‑edits for rhetorical effect.

Year 9 — Relevant outcomes and how the lesson meets them

  • Outcome focus: Creating sophisticated sentence variety for tone and purpose; analysing how punctuation and structure influence meaning in historical and contemporary texts.
  • How this lesson meets the outcome: The lesson includes analysis of Augustine’s sentence shapes and medieval punctuation choices (why scribes punctuated where confusion might arise). Students practice reproducing and adapting these patterns for different tones and purposes.
  • Meets or exceeds? Meets: Students who analyze and explain why punctuation guided the sensus and then apply these strategies meet Year 9 outcomes. Exceeds if the student can clearly justify syntactic choices and craft multi‑sentence passages using varied patterns.

Year 10 — Relevant outcomes and how the lesson meets them

  • Outcome focus: Using a broad range of grammatical and rhetorical structures to achieve purpose and voice; critically responding to complex texts and reproducing rhetorical effects.
  • How this lesson meets the outcome: By moving from copying to structural imitation to original composition, students practise advanced control of syntax and rhetorical intention. The lesson’s emphasis on voice (not being mechanical) and the medieval punctus example help students think historically and rhetorically.
  • Meets or exceeds? Partly meets: The lesson provides strong preparation for Year 10 standards. To fully exceed Year 10 expectations, students should apply these structures consistently across extended writing (e.g., essays or speeches), show controlled variation for tone/purpose, and provide written reflection comparing their choices to the model text.

10. Final judgment — If, how, where, and why this lesson meets standards

If the student completes the full lesson sequence (copying, analysis, imitation, revision), then:

  • Year 8: This lesson meets standards by teaching structural awareness, punctuation for clarity, and practice producing varied sentences.
  • Year 9: This lesson meets standards by adding historical/punctuation analysis and purposeful imitation; students learn rhetorical reasons for punctuation choices.
  • Year 10: This lesson lays strong groundwork and partially meets the Year 10 expectations. It will fully meet or exceed Year 10 standards when extended to multi‑paragraph composition, sustained rhetorical intent, and reflective justification of syntactic choices.

11. Next steps & tips to push into Year 10 excellence

  • Turn single imitation sentences into a paragraph that uses several different model patterns (coherence practice).
  • Write a short reflection (100–200 words) explaining why you kept or changed clause orders and punctuation — link this to audience/purpose.
  • Compare your sentence to an extract of a contemporary writer and a medieval scribe: how does punctuation guide meaning differently?

12. Quick wrap

Imitating sentence patterns trains your brain to think in different syntactic shapes. Start by copying, move to strict imitation, then give the sentence your voice. Pay attention to clause types, order, and punctuation — like medieval scribes, you add pointing where readers could get lost. Do this and your writing will sound confident and clear, not forced — leaves on the trees, not leaves glued on.


Ask a followup question

Loading...