The Capitulare de Villis — Fishponds (Clauses 21, 62 & 65)
Student details: Name: ____________________ Class: _______ Date: __________
Instructions (open‑book): You may use the provided document and a dictionary. Answer all five questions. Write clearly. Where a diagram or flowchart is requested, draw the boxes and label them; keep each label 1–3 sentences unless told otherwise.
Part A — Short answer & vocabulary (Q1–Q4)
-
Q1 (2 marks) — Dictionary skills
Using a dictionary, write a clear, short definition (in your own words) for each of these words as they are used in clause 21. Keep each definition to one sentence.a) Fishponds:
b) Practicable:
-
Q2 (3 marks) — Direct purposes
According to clauses 21 and 65, list two specific purposes or uses the king expects stewards to have for fishponds. Give each purpose in one short phrase.1)2) -
Q3 (4 marks) — Text‑centred claim with evidence
Write a 1–2 sentence claim answering this question: "What is the main reason the king requires fishponds to be kept and managed?" Then copy one short quote (up to 12 words) from clause 21 or 65 that best supports your claim. Underline where you copied the clause number.Claim (1–2 sentences):
Quotation (copy exactly):
Clause number: __________ -
Q4 (3 marks) — Short analysis (2–3 sentences)
Using clause 62 and clause 65, explain in 2–3 sentences how fishponds would appear in the king's annual statement of income and why that mattered.Answer (2–3 sentences):
Part B — Creative multi‑step flowchart tasks (Q5)
For both tasks below, draw a simple flowchart with boxes and arrows in the blank area. Next to each box, write a short label or sentence (1–3 sentences) that explains that step.
Draw a flowchart that shows the main five steps a steward should follow across a year to keep fishponds useful and profitable (for example: maintain, stock, sell, replace, report). Provide short labels for each box (1–3 sentences each).
Draw a short flowchart (3–5 boxes) showing how fish are sold from the pond, replaced, and how the money or profit from that sale is recorded and reported in the annual statement (clause 62 and 65). Keep each label 1–3 sentences.
Total marks: 18
TEACHER PAGE — Separate when printing
Note: Below are ACARA‑aligned rubric criteria (v9 broad outcomes), point descriptors, and brief Ally McBeal‑style feedback for each question. Copy or paste into your LMS or mark sheet.
General ACARA alignment (broad):
- Comprehension and analysis of a historical legal text (interpretation of clauses and purposes).
- Use of evidence and quotation to support claims.
- Vocabulary and dictionary skills to interpret archaic or formal words.
- Planning and sequencing information (flowchart tasks) to show causal and administrative processes.
Rubrics & Feedback (Ally McBeal cadence)
- 2: Precise, age‑appropriate definitions in own words for both terms; shows understanding of historical usage.
- 1: Partial or vague definitions; one term correctly explained.
- 0: Definitions missing or incorrect.
Oh wow — crisp as a courtroom gavel! You grabbed the meanings straight from the dictionary and made them your own. If you missed one, darling, tuck that little word into your notes and try again.
- 3: Two clear, accurate purposes taken from the text (e.g., food supply, profit) and concise phrasing.
- 2: One clear purpose and one partially correct answer.
- 1: One correct purpose only or vague answers.
- 0: Incorrect or missing answers.
Snap! You saw what the king wanted and wrote it down like a pro. Two tidy purposes — music to my ears. If you only got one, be brave next time and hunt for the second hiding in the clause.
- 4: A clear 1–2 sentence claim directly answering the question plus an accurate quote (clause cited) that supports the claim.
- 3: Claim clear; quote relevant but citation or wording slightly off.
- 2: Claim weak or only partially linked to quote; limited evidence use.
- 1: Vague claim; no supporting quote.
- 0: Missing or unrelated response.
Bravo! That claim was sharp and your quote did the heavy lifting — you basically staged a one‑act proof. If the quote was shaky, darling, next time clip it exactly and cite the clause like a tiny scholar.
- 3: Two to three clear sentences explaining how fishponds feature in the annual statement and why they matter (income, accounting, record keeping).
- 2: One clear point plus partial explanation (e.g., notes income but not why it matters).
- 1: Limited or confused explanation.
- 0: No answer.
You connected the dots — fish to funds to form (statement). It was tidy and decisive, like a final season reveal. If briefness made it fuzzy, prod that second sentence into place.
- 3: Logical sequence (3–5 clear steps), each labelled with a concise 1–3 sentence explanation that reflects the clauses (maintain/stock/sell/replace/report). Diagram is readable.
- 2: Sequence mostly logical but one step missing or labels too brief; diagram mostly clear.
- 1: Sequence unclear, missing major steps; labels not informative.
- 0: No diagram or irrelevant content.
Oh, the choreography! Your steps flowed — from pond upkeep to profit and paperwork — like a courtroom dance. If a step tripped, simply add a connecting arrow and a sentence; drama is solved by clarity.
Overall comment for a 'Proficient' outcome (Ally McBeal cadence)
Darling, you hit the brief like a star in the spotlight — your answers show clear understanding of the king's instructions about fishponds, you supported a tidy claim with textual evidence, and your flowcharts showed the administrative journey from pond to profit to paper. Keep tightening quotes (exact words, clause numbers) and ensure every flowchart box carries a sentence or two of explanation. You are proficient — confident, accurate and organized. Bravo! Now go make that evidence sing even louder.
Suggested next steps for growth: encourage the student to practise exact quotation copying (spelling and clause numbering), and to add precise dates or seasonal markers to flowcharts (e.g., "Lent/Christmas reporting times") to demonstrate deeper textual ties to clause 62.
Teacher use: Copy rubric marks into your gradebook. Use the Ally‑style comments for student feedback; adapt tone to suit your classroom. This exam is open‑book; keep time limit as you prefer (suggested 30–40 minutes).