PDF

How to use these Cornell-style flashcards

Each card is formatted for Cornell notes: a short cue (left) and detailed notes/examples (right). Use the cue to quiz yourself, then cover the note side and try to produce the phrasing. At the bottom are quick practice prompts and a cadence guide (the "Fallout" cadence = short, clear bursts with strong pauses to sound formal and confident).

Cornell cue
Short phrase, word, or question to prompt recall. Use this side when self-testing.
Summary: Write a 1–2 sentence summary at the bottom of each card after studying to lock in the idea.
Science — Evidence phrase
"The data indicate(s) that..." — Use when reporting results. Example: "The data indicate a 12% increase in enzyme activity under higher temperature." Use with specific numbers or observations. Alternative: "Measurements show..."
History — Source attribution
"According to [primary source/Scholar],..." — Use to introduce evidence from documents or historians. Example: "According to eyewitness accounts, the protest began at dawn." Follow with a citation: (Source, year) or "Primary source shows..."
Maths — Logical connector
"Therefore/Hence/It follows that..." — Use after a calculation or proof step. Example: "x = 3; therefore, substituting gives..." Keep it precise: show the operation and then the connector plus result.
Debate — Claim phrase
"I contend that..." / "It is my position that..." — Strong opening for a claim. Use followed by one clear reason and supporting evidence. Example: "I contend that uniforms improve attendance because data from District A show..."
Formal connectors
Addition: "Furthermore", "Moreover". Contrast: "However", "On the other hand", "Conversely". Cause/effect: "Therefore", "Consequently", "As a result". Use them at sentence starts or mid-sentence with a comma: "However, the sample size was small."
Legalese / formal phrasing
Words & phrases often used in formal/legal writing: "Notwithstanding" (despite), "Whereas" (introducing facts), "Hereinafter" (later referred to as), "Pursuant to" (in accordance with). Use sparingly and only when you need a formal tone — otherwise prefer plain language. Example: "Notwithstanding the earlier statement, new evidence suggests..."
Quoting / reporting speech
"[Author] states/argues/claims that..." — When introducing a quotation or paraphrase. Example: "Smith (2018) argues that '...'", or "Smith (2018) claims that the increase is attributable to..." Use verbs that fit: states (neutral), argues (takes a stance), asserts (strong).
Hedging (softening claims)
"Suggests", "appears to", "may indicate" — Use when evidence is not definitive. Example: "The results suggest a correlation, but further tests are needed." Hedging is important in science and formal writing to avoid overclaiming.
Concession / contrast
"Although/While it is true that..., nevertheless..." — Show you recognise the other side and then rebut or limit it. Example (debate): "Although opponents argue X, the evidence Y undermines that claim."
Citing sources
"(Author, Year)" or "According to [Author/Source]" — Use after claims that rely on published work. Example: "(Nguyen, 2020)" or "According to the 2020 report, ..." Helps readers check your evidence.
Combined example
"According to Smith (2019), the sample grew by 20%. Therefore, the hypothesis is supported; however, the sample size is small and further study is required." — This sentence uses source attribution, a formal connector (therefore), contrast (however), and hedging (further study required).
'Fallout' cadence tips (speak like this when presenting formal points)
  • Short chunks: speak in 2–5 word phrases. Pause briefly between chunks.
  • Emphasise verbs and conclusions: put vocal stress on "indicates", "demonstrates", "therefore".
  • Use lower pitch for qualifiers, higher for main claim. Ex: "The data indicates (low) — therefore, we conclude (high)."
  • End sentences with a firm final syllable (don’t trail off) to sound confident.
  • Practice: read the combined example in three bursts: 1) source; 2) claim; 3) limitation.
Practice prompts
  1. Pick a short paragraph in your science text. Rewrite two sentences using a formal connector and a hedging phrase.
  2. Write a one-line claim for a debate topic using "I contend that..." and follow with one supporting reason and one concession.
  3. Record yourself reading a formal sentence using the cadence tips. Listen and adjust pauses/stress.

Note: These phrases and strategies map to Years 9–10 language goals in ACARA v9 — developing subject-specific literacy, appropriate register, and citing evidence across disciplines. Use them while completing science reports, history source analyses, mathematical explanations, and debate prep.

Summary: Use the cue side to prompt recall, practice subject-specific signal phrases (reporting, attributing, hedging, connecting), and read aloud with clear short phrases and strong final stress to build a formal, confident academic voice.

Ask a followup question

Loading...