Instructions
Read each section carefully and answer the questions to the best of your ability. This worksheet explores the foundational texts and legends of Early Britain, examining how history, myth, and literature intertwine to shape our understanding of the past.
Part 1: Match the Source to its Description
Match the name or text in Column A with the most accurate description in Column B. Write the correct letter in the space provided.
Column A
|
Column B
|
Part 2: Critical Thinking
Answer the following questions in complete sentences, using the information from the sources provided in your learning materials.
-
Gildas, writing On the Ruin and Conquest of Britain, and Geoffrey of Monmouth, writing History of the Kings of Britain, both covered the post-Roman era. How did their purpose and tone likely differ?
-
Holinshed's Chronicles provided the historical basis for Shakespeare's plays King Lear and Macbeth. Why do we categorize Shakespeare's plays as "tragedies" or "dramas" rather than historical documents?
-
The "dream of a united Britain" is a powerful theme associated with King Arthur. Why do you think this story, especially as popularized by Geoffrey of Monmouth, became so important to the identity of Britain in the Middle Ages and beyond?
Part 3: Source Analysis
Read the following passage, which reflects the style and content of one of the key texts we are studying.
"Woe to the land! For its leaders are blind and its priests are corrupt. God has turned His face from us, sending the ravenous wolves from the east—the Saxons—to punish us for our endless vanities and unforgivable sins. Our cities burn not because our foe is strong, but because our faith is weak. This island, once a noble province of Rome, is now a desolate ruin, a testament to our own wickedness."
Which author does this passage most sound like: Gildas or Geoffrey of Monmouth? Explain your reasoning, pointing to specific words or themes in the text.
Answer Key
Part 1: Match the Source to its Description
- C. Gildas
- E. Geoffrey of Monmouth
- B. The Mabinogion
- F. Holinshed's Chronicles
- D. William Shakespeare
- A. King Arthur
Part 2: Critical Thinking
(Note: Student answers may vary but should contain the core ideas below.)
- Gildas's purpose was religious and moral; he wrote a sermon (a polemic) to condemn the Britons for their sins, which he saw as the cause of their military defeats. His tone would be angry, despairing, and judgmental. Geoffrey of Monmouth's purpose was to create a heroic, unifying national history. His tone would be epic, celebratory, and patriotic, focusing on glorious kings and battles, even if they were fictional.
- We categorize Shakespeare's plays as tragedies because his primary goal was not historical accuracy but dramatic effect. He changed events, created dialogue, compressed timelines, and focused on universal human themes like ambition (Macbeth) and pride (Lear). While Holinshed provided the plot, Shakespeare was interested in exploring the psychology of his characters and creating a powerful emotional experience for the audience.
- The story was important because it provided a sense of shared, glorious history during a time of political fragmentation and conflict (e.g., after the Norman Conquest). It created a heroic origin story that wasn't Roman, but distinctly British. The idea of a strong, unified kingdom under a legendary hero like Arthur was an inspiring model for contemporary kings and a source of national pride.
Part 3: Source Analysis
This passage sounds like Gildas.
Reasoning: The tone is overwhelmingly negative and moralistic, which is the defining feature of On the Ruin and Conquest of Britain. Key evidence includes:
- Focus on Sin: The passage explicitly blames the Britons' defeat on their "corrupt priests," "endless vanities," "unforgivable sins," and "wickedness."
- Divine Punishment: It frames the Saxon invasion not as a simple military event, but as a punishment from God ("God has turned His face from us").
- Despairing Language: Words like "Woe," "blind," "corrupt," "desolate ruin" reflect the despairing, sermon-like quality of Gildas's work, not the heroic, epic style of Geoffrey of Monmouth.